...from the Almighty Doc Jensen.
Lots of good stuff about what we might expect from tonights episode, which will focus on the suddenly-important-for-some-reason Nikki and Paulo.
Looks like even though we'll focus on these two third-string benchwarmers, there'll be lots of other juicy info and details dropped. Sounds like surprises are in order.
And he answers some questions (sort of), including this one, which I hadn't really thought about...
When Locke was walking away from the submarine last week, he appeared to be soaking wet, despite the fact that we never saw him get into the water. This has led to speculation among fans that Locke didn't actually blow up the sub, but instead, took it out to sea, submerged it, and blew up the dock â?? all part of a plan to make it appear the submarine was destroyed. The question is this: Are we supposed to be wondering why John Locke was all wet? Intriguingly, Damon Lindelof says: ''No comment.''
(There were a lot of C&D "Maybe's" and "No Comments" here....)
I thought he was just wet because he maybe places the charge somewhere on the outside, or in the ballasts, or something...
That's an interesting little sub-theory right there....
And be sure to read all the way down for his latest theorization.
Link:
A ''Lost'' Cause? | Lost | Doc Jensen | TV | Entertainment WeeklyTechnorati Tags:
LOST,
Expose,
nikki,
paulo,
submarine,
locke,
theories